For the past 48 hours, I have been chained to my computer, reading everything I can find about tenure and academic freedom. Most of the articles quoting lawmakers in favor of eliminating tenure in the Florida State College System make it clear that reporters, in general, don't understand what tenure is and what purpose it serves for students. I was a little hazy on this topic as well before I attended the
Community College Conference on Legal Issues. I attended a session there on academic freedom, but tenure was also a major topic of conversation. I was fascinated to learn what tenure is and is not, legally speaking.
Tenure is...
A guarantee of due process for faculty in support of academic freedom in the classroom and in research. In other words, if I challenge students in class to consider ideas that differ from those upheld by my college administration, I am protected by my tenure regarding my use of academic freedom to encourage students to think critically and ask questions.
Tenure is not...
A guarantee of forever employment, nor is it a way to protect bad teachers from losing their jobs. It does not allow me to behave inappropriately towards students or colleagues.
In my own words, tenure does not make me "furniture" at my institution. Rather, it makes me the kind of teacher who is permitted to inspire my students to think, to question, and to act within their system of values. Tenure has made me a good teacher, and my annual performance reviews confirm this fact.
Now, if you are going to write to your state representative, don't tell them what tenure means to ME. Tell them what it means to you. Some discussion points you may want to consider are listed here, but please feel free to use your own. Try to keep them focused on what ending tenure would mean to the students and to learning - not what it means to you personally. Besides, you are a good teacher and your job is not in jeopardy, right? But your students' learning
is.
- Tenure was created to protect academic freedom and the right, no - the obligation of faculty to inspire students to think critically and ask important questions. It is critical that faculty teach students to do these things. We are educating tomorrow's future citizens.
- Tenure is what allows faculty to innovate. Asking questions and trying new things has led to countless developments in the industry of education. Without it, innovation will suffer.
- Think of a controversial topic you've discussed in class that may have been at odds with someone in your supervisory path. Without tenure, you may not have felt able to share ideas with students and inspire them to think. Share this story in your letter.
- Teaching at a community college is a calling for many people. But many of the best community college teachers are actively recruited by universities hoping to boost the performance of their lower-division students. A good percentage of these instructor positions carry tenure. Does it make sense to not entice the most talented teachers to stay at the institutions where they can be of service to the students who need them the most?
Those are just a few thoughts I have for now. Please comment and share other ways to express your clear, cohesive, logical thoughts on this with your representative. These folks are most often not from the educational field and it is our job to educate them about this issue. Let's take that seriously.
It has been suggested to me that it might be helpful to develop a "canned communication" to share with folks who may not have the time and inclination to write their own letter but would be happy to forward something on. I'd love to do this, but I need some help. Please contact me if you are willing to help out with this! Thanks.